Spring Cloud OpenFeign源码分析,你是否遇到过不导入Ribbon应用会启动不起来?

本篇内容:

  • 为什么使用feign
  • openfeign源码分析
  • 疑问一:openfeign是怎么拿到url的?
  • 疑问二:为什么不导入ribbon应用会启动不起来?

为什么使用feign

因为我们想像dubbo调用远程服务一样,节省构建请求body并发送http请求,还要手动反序列化响应结果的步骤。使用feign能够让我们像同进程的接口方法调用一样调用远程进程的接口。

feignspring cloud组件中的一个轻量级restfulhttp服务客户端,内置了ribbon(因此使用feign也需要引入ribbon的依赖)。openfeignspring cloudfeign的基础上支持了spring mvc的注解,如@RequesMapping@GetMapping@PostMapping等。

使用openfeign声明接口的例子:

@FeignClient(name = 'sck-demo-provider',

path = "/v1",

url = "http://sck-demo-provider",

primary = false)

publicinterfaceDemoService{

@GetMapping("/hello")

GenericResponse<String> sayHello();

}

feign用于服务消费端,即接口调用端,因此需要将服务提供端暴露的接口提取出来创建一个Module。当然,服务提供端也会依赖这个Module,因为数据传输对象DTO需要共用,也将DTO类跟接口放在一起,但不推荐服务提供者强制使用implements去实现接口。

源码分析

使用openfegin我们可以不用在yaml文件添加任何关于openfegin的配置,而只需要在一个被@Configuration注释的配置类上或者Application启动类上添加@EnableFeignClients注解。例如:

@EnableFeignClients(basePackages = {"com.wujiuye.sck.consumer"})

publicclassSckDemoConsumerApplication{

}

basePackages属性用于指定被@FeignClient注解注释的接口所在的包的包名,或者也可以直接指定clients属性,clients属性可以直接指定一个或多个被@FeignClient注释的类。basePackages是一个数组,如果被@FeignClient注解注释的接口比较分散,可以指定多个包名,而不使用一个大的包名,这样可以减少包扫描耗费的时间,不拖慢应用的启动速度。

@Import(FeignClientsRegistrar.class)

public@interface EnableFeignClients {

}

@EnableFeignClients注解使用@Import导入FeignClientsRegistrar类,这是一个ImportBeanDefinitionRegistrar,因此我们重点关注它的registerBeanDefinitions方法。(关于Spring的知识点,默认大家都懂了)。

classFeignClientsRegistrar

implementsImportBeanDefinitionRegistrar, ResourceLoaderAware, EnvironmentAware{

@Override

publicvoidregisterBeanDefinitions(AnnotationMetadata metadata,

BeanDefinitionRegistry registry){

registerDefaultConfiguration(metadata, registry);

registerFeignClients(metadata, registry);

}

}

重点关注registerFeignClients方法,该方法负责读取@EnableFeignClients的属性,获取需要扫描的包名,然后扫描指定的所有包名下的被@FeignClient注解注释的接口,将扫描出来的接口调用registerFeignClient方法注册到spring容器。

classFeignClientsRegistrar

implementsImportBeanDefinitionRegistrar, ResourceLoaderAware, EnvironmentAware{

privatevoidregisterFeignClient(BeanDefinitionRegistry registry,

AnnotationMetadata annotationMetadata, Map<String, Object> attributes){

String className = annotationMetadata.getClassName();

BeanDefinitionBuilder definition = BeanDefinitionBuilder

.genericBeanDefinition(FeignClientFactoryBean.class);

definition.addPropertyValue("url", getUrl(attributes));

definition.addPropertyValue("path", getPath(attributes));

String name = getName(attributes);

definition.addPropertyValue("name", name);

String contextId = getContextId(attributes);

definition.addPropertyValue("contextId", contextId);

// ......

definition.setAutowireMode(AbstractBeanDefinition.AUTOWIRE_BY_TYPE);

String alias = contextId + "FeignClient";

AbstractBeanDefinition beanDefinition = definition.getBeanDefinition();

beanDefinition.setAttribute(FactoryBean.OBJECT_TYPE_ATTRIBUTE, className);

boolean primary = (Boolean) attributes.get("primary");

beanDefinition.setPrimary(primary);

String qualifier = getQualifier(attributes);

if (StringUtils.hasText(qualifier)) {

alias = qualifier;

}

BeanDefinitionHolder holder = new BeanDefinitionHolder(beanDefinition, className,

new String[] { alias });

BeanDefinitionReaderUtils.registerBeanDefinition(holder, registry);

}

}

registerFeignClient源码所示,该方法根据读取@FeignClient注解的属性配置,以及该接口的类名信息,向Spring bean工厂注册一个FeignClientFactoryBean,从名称可以看出这是一个FactoryBean,因此接下来我们主要看这个FactoryBeangetObject方法、getObjectType方法。getObjectType方法不用说,肯定是返回当前的被@FeignClient注解注释的那个接口的类名。

classFeignClientFactoryBean

implementsFactoryBean<Object>, InitializingBean, ApplicationContextAware{

@Override

public Object getObject()throws Exception {

return getTarget();

}

}

getObject方法调用getTarget方法,但由于getTarget方法太长,只截取部分。

classFeignClientFactoryBean

implementsFactoryBean<Object>, InitializingBean, ApplicationContextAware{

<T> T getTarget(){

FeignContext context = this.applicationContext.getBean(FeignContext.class);

Feign.Builder builder = feign(context);

// .......

String url = this.url + cleanPath();

Client client = getOptional(context, Client.class);

if (client != null) {

if (client instanceof LoadBalancerFeignClient) {

client = ((LoadBalancerFeignClient) client).getDelegate();

}

if (client instanceof FeignBlockingLoadBalancerClient) {

client = ((FeignBlockingLoadBalancerClient) client).getDelegate();

}

builder.client(client);

}

Targeter targeter = get(context, Targeter.class);

return (T) targeter.target(this, builder, context,

new HardCodedTarget<>(this.type, this.name, url));

}

}

Clienthttp协议接口调用的实现,其定义如下:

publicinterfaceClient{

Response execute(Request request, Options options)throws IOException;

}

正常情况下,getTarget方法中调用getOptional方法获取到的ClientNULL。不正常情况就是添加了ribbonstarter包,这时拿到的ClientLoadBalancerFeignClient,我们后面分析。

不管怎样,FeignClientFactoryBeangetTarget方法最后都是调用Targettarget方法来获取实现该接口的实例。Target的实现类有两个:DefaultTargeterHystrixTargeter。在不使用Hystrix的情况下,我们只分析DefaultTargeter的实现。

classDefaultTargeterimplementsTargeter{

@Override

public <T> T target(FeignClientFactoryBean factory, Feign.Builder feign,

FeignContext context, Target.HardCodedTarget<T> target){

return feign.target(target);

}

}

如上源码所示,DefaultTargeter调用Feign.Builder实例的target方法生成接口的实例,我们继续跟踪target方法的调用链,直到找到创建接口实例的方法。

如图所示,Feign.BuildernewInstance方法正是创建接口实例的方法。有两种实现,一种是支持接口方法异步调用的,一种是普通的同步调用实现。不过这里用的还是ReflectiveFeign

publicclassReflectiveFeignextendsFeign{

@Override

public <T> T newInstance(Target<T> target){

Map<String, MethodHandler> nameToHandler = targetToHandlersByName.apply(target);

// ......

Map<Method, MethodHandler> methodToHandler = new LinkedHashMap<Method, MethodHandler>();

// ......

InvocationHandler handler = factory.create(target, methodToHandler);

T proxy = (T) Proxy.newProxyInstance(target.type().getClassLoader(),

new Class<?>[] {target.type()}, handler);

// .......

return proxy;

}

}

很熟悉的JDK动态代理。因此,Feign并不会为接口生成实现类,而是生成一个动态代理对象。factory.create这句创建的InvocationHandler正是FeignInvocationHandler,此InvocationHandlerJDK实现动态代理的InvocationHandler,而MethodHandlerfeign定义的MethodHandlermethodToHandler存储的是接口中定义的方法与feign生成的MethodHandler映射关系。

staticclassFeignInvocationHandlerimplementsInvocationHandler{

privatefinal Target target;

privatefinal Map<Method, MethodHandler> dispatch;

FeignInvocationHandler(Target target, Map<Method, MethodHandler> dispatch) {

this.target = checkNotNull(target, "target");

this.dispatch = checkNotNull(dispatch, "dispatch for %s", target);

}

@Override

public Object invoke(Object proxy, Method method, Object[] args)throws Throwable {

// ....

return dispatch.get(method).invoke(args);

}

}

当我们调用接口的方法时,都会走到FeignInvocationHandlerinvoke方法,invoker方法根据method获取对应的MethodHandler,并调用MethodHandlerinvoke方法。往后MethodHandler要做的事情我们也基本能猜测得出来了。

想要找出这些MethodHandler在哪创建的,就需要回头从FeignClientFactoryBeangetTarget调用DefaultTargetertarget方法开始,DefaultTargetertarget方法直接调用Feign.Buildertarget方法,Feign.Buildertarget方法在调用newInstance方法之前调用了自身的build方法。

publicclassFeign{

publicstaticclassBuilder{

public <T> T target(Target<T> target){

return build().newInstance(target);

}

public Feign build(){

//......

ParseHandlersByName handlersByName =

new ParseHandlersByName(contract, options, encoder, decoder, queryMapEncoder,

errorDecoder, synchronousMethodHandlerFactory);

returnnew ReflectiveFeign(handlersByName, invocationHandlerFactory, queryMapEncoder);

}

}

}

build生成的Feign实例是ReflectiveFeign,因此,ReflectiveFeignnewInstance方式的这句:

Map<String, MethodHandler> nameToHandler = targetToHandlersByName.apply(target);

targetToHandlersByName就是ParseHandlersByName的实例,我们来看下ParseHandlersByNameapply方法。

staticfinalclassParseHandlersByName{

public Map<String, MethodHandler> apply(Target target){

// 解析接口的方法,生成MethodMetadata实例

List<MethodMetadata> metadata = contract.parseAndValidateMetadata(target.type());

Map<String, MethodHandler> result = new LinkedHashMap<String, MethodHandler>();

// 遍历接口方法

for (MethodMetadata md : metadata) {

// ......

if (md.isIgnored()) {

result.put(md.configKey(), args -> {

thrownew IllegalStateException(md.configKey() + " is not a method handled by feign");

});

} else {

// 调用Factory实例的create方法来创建MethodHandler

result.put(md.configKey(),

factory.create(target, md, buildTemplate, options, decoder, errorDecoder));

}

}

return result;

}

}

apply方法负责解析接口的方法,并为每个接口方法调用Factory实例的create方法创建MethodHandler

staticclassFactory{

public MethodHandler create(Target<?> target,

MethodMetadata md,

RequestTemplate.Factory buildTemplateFromArgs,

Options options,

Decoder decoder,

ErrorDecoder errorDecoder){

returnnew SynchronousMethodHandler(target, client, retryer, requestInterceptors, logger,

logLevel, md, buildTemplateFromArgs, options, decoder,

errorDecoder, decode404, closeAfterDecode, propagationPolicy, forceDecoding);

}

}

创建的MethodHandler的类型是SynchronousMethodHandler。因此,当我们调用接口的方法时,最终调用的是SynchronousMethodHandlerinvoke方法。

publicclassSynchronousMethodHandlerimplementsMethodHandler{

@Override

public Object invoke(Object[] argv)throws Throwable {

RequestTemplate template = buildTemplateFromArgs.create(argv);

Options options = findOptions(argv);

Retryer retryer = this.retryer.clone();

while (true) {

try {

return executeAndDecode(template, options);

} catch (RetryableException e) {

try {

retryer.continueOrPropagate(e);

} catch (RetryableException th) {

Throwable cause = th.getCause();

if (propagationPolicy == UNWRAP && cause != null) {

throw cause;

} else {

throw th;

}

}

if (logLevel != Logger.Level.NONE) {

logger.logRetry(metadata.configKey(), logLevel);

}

continue;

}

}

}

}

invoke方法做的事情就是包装请求参数调用接口,如果配置了重试次数,失败会重试。还记得FeignClientFactoryBeangetTarget方法调用Targettarget方法时传递的一个HardCodedTarget实例吗?这个就是用来生成请求参数Request的。

executeAndDecode方法:

publicclassSynchronousMethodHandlerimplementsMethodHandler{

Object executeAndDecode(RequestTemplate template, Options options)throws Throwable {

Request request = targetRequest(template);

Response response;

long start = System.nanoTime();

try {

response = client.execute(request, options);

response = response.toBuilder()

.request(request)

.requestTemplate(template)

.build();

} catch (IOException e) {

throw errorExecuting(request, e);

}

long elapsedTime = TimeUnit.NANOSECONDS.toMillis(System.nanoTime() - start);

if (decoder != null)

return decoder.decode(response, metadata.returnType());

// .......

}

}

Client我们前面提到过,就是实现发送http协议请求的,那SynchronousMethodHandler实例的这个client是哪个Client的实现类呢?答案在Fegin的内部类Builder

publicclassFegin{

publicstaticclassBuild{

private Client client = new Client.Default(null, null);

}

}

其实上面分析的源码过程,到FeginBuilder开始,就是Fegin的代码,而不是openfeign。文章开头说openfeign支持spring mvc的注解,但是我们好像跳过了,这里提供一个调用链,大家可以根据这个调用链去找源码。

feign.ReflectiveFeign.ParseHandlersByName.apply

> feign.Contract.BaseContract.parseAndValidateMetadata(java.lang.Class<?>)

> feign.Contract.BaseContract.parseAndValidateMetadata(java.lang.Class<?>, java.lang.reflect.Method)

> org.springframework.cloud.openfeign.support.SpringMvcContract.processAnnotationOnMethod

SpringMvcContractprocessAnnotationOnMethod方法源码如下:

publicclassSpringMvcContractextendsContract.BaseContract

implementsResourceLoaderAware{

@Override

protectedvoidprocessAnnotationOnMethod(MethodMetadata data,

Annotation methodAnnotation, Method method){

if (!RequestMapping.class.isInstance(methodAnnotation) && !methodAnnotation

.annotationType().isAnnotationPresent(RequestMapping.class)) {

return;

}

RequestMapping methodMapping = findMergedAnnotation(method, RequestMapping.class);

// HTTP Method

RequestMethod[] methods = methodMapping.method();

if (methods.length == 0) {

methods = new RequestMethod[] { RequestMethod.GET };

}

checkOne(method, methods, "method");

data.template().method(Request.HttpMethod.valueOf(methods[0].name()));

// path

checkAtMostOne(method, methodMapping.value(), "value");

if (methodMapping.value().length > 0) {

String pathValue = emptyToNull(methodMapping.value()[0]);

if (pathValue != null) {

pathValue = resolve(pathValue);

if (!pathValue.equals("/")) {

data.template().uri(pathValue, true);

}

}

}

// produces

parseProduces(data, method, methodMapping);

// consumes

parseConsumes(data, method, methodMapping);

// headers

parseHeaders(data, method, methodMapping);

data.indexToExpander(new LinkedHashMap<Integer, Param.Expander>());

}

}

通过分析openfeign的源码,我们已经了解了openfeign是怎样与Spring整合的,以及feign到底做了什么,在源码分析的过程中,我们忽略了一些细节,而这些留到我们遇到问题时再去深挖。

疑问一:openfeign是怎么拿到url的?

你不好奇openfeign是怎么拿到注册中心的服务url的吗?

@FeignClient(name = YcpayConstant.SERVICE_NAME,

path = "/v1",

primary = false)

当我们未配置@FeignClienturl属性时,name就起作用了。FeignClientFactoryBeangetTarget方法被我们忽略的代码:

classFeignClientFactoryBean

implementsFactoryBean<Object>, InitializingBean, ApplicationContextAware{

<T> T getTarget(){

// .....

if (!StringUtils.hasText(this.url)) {

if (!this.name.startsWith("http")) {

// 就是这句

this.url = "http://" + this.name;

}

else {

this.url = this.name;

}

this.url += cleanPath();

return (T) loadBalance(builder, context,

new HardCodedTarget<>(this.type, this.name, this.url));

}

if (StringUtils.hasText(this.url) && !this.url.startsWith("http")) {

this.url = "http://" + this.url;

}

// .......

}

}

假设我们配置的namesck-demo-provider,那么生成的url就是:

http://sck-demo-provider

疑问二:

你不好奇吗?为什么使用openfeign时,不配置url,且不导入ribbon的依赖会报错?

异常信息如下:

No Feign Client for loadBalancing defined. Did you forget to include spring-cloud-starter-netflix-ribbon?

在分析FeignClientFactoryBeangetTarget方法源码时,我们漏掉了一些代码:

classFeignClientFactoryBean

implementsFactoryBean<Object>, InitializingBean, ApplicationContextAware{

<T> T getTarget(){

// ......

if (!StringUtils.hasText(this.url)) {

if (!this.name.startsWith("http")) {

this.url = "http://" + this.name;

}

else {

this.url = this.name;

}

this.url += cleanPath();

// loadBalance

return (T) loadBalance(builder, context,

new HardCodedTarget<>(this.type, this.name, this.url));

}

if (StringUtils.hasText(this.url) && !this.url.startsWith("http")) {

this.url = "http://" + this.url;

}

String url = this.url + cleanPath();

Client client = getOptional(context, Client.class);

if (client != null) {

if (client instanceof LoadBalancerFeignClient) {

// not load balancing because we have a url,

// but ribbon is on the classpath, so unwrap

client = ((LoadBalancerFeignClient) client).getDelegate();

}

if (client instanceof FeignBlockingLoadBalancerClient) {

// not load balancing because we have a url,

// but Spring Cloud LoadBalancer is on the classpath, so unwrap

client = ((FeignBlockingLoadBalancerClient) client).getDelegate();

}

builder.client(client);

}

//......

}

}

两种情况:

  • 1、如果指定了URL,那么getOptional方法不会返回null,且返回的ClientLoadBalancerFeignClient,但不会抛出异常。
  • 2、如果不指定URL,则走负载均衡逻辑,走的是loadBalance方法,且抛出异常。

classFeignClientFactoryBean

implementsFactoryBean<Object>, InitializingBean, ApplicationContextAware{

protected <T> T loadBalance(Feign.Builder builder, FeignContext context,

HardCodedTarget<T> target){

// getOptional的最终调用:

// public <T> T getInstance(String name, Class<T> type) {

// AnnotationConfigApplicationContext context = getContext(name);

// if (BeanFactoryUtils.beanNamesForTypeIncludingAncestors(context,

// type).length > 0) {

// return context.getBean(type);

// }

// return null;

// }

Client client = getOptional(context, Client.class);

if (client != null) {

builder.client(client);

Targeter targeter = get(context, Targeter.class);

return targeter.target(this, builder, context, target);

}

thrownew IllegalStateException(

"No Feign Client for loadBalancing defined. Did you forget to include spring-cloud-starter-netflix-ribbon?");

}

}

根据前面的分析,正常情况下getOptional方法返回的Client绝对是NULL,所以就执行到了loadBalance方法的最后一行代码,抛出IllegalStateException异常。

现在我们可以猜测,难道添加ribbon之后,getOptional就不返回NULL了吗?自动创建了一个Client实例并交由Spring管理?这个Client又是什么?

我们看下spring-cloud-starter-openfeign依赖导入的spring-cloud-openfeign-core,查看

自动配置文件spring.factories

spring.factories文件的内容如下:

org.springframework.boot.autoconfigure.EnableAutoConfiguration=

org.springframework.cloud.openfeign.ribbon.FeignRibbonClientAutoConfiguration

// 其它省略

其中FeignRibbonClientAutoConfiguration应该就是我们要找的。

@ConditionalOnClass({ ILoadBalancer.class, Feign.class })

@ConditionalOnProperty(value = "spring.cloud.loadbalancer.ribbon.enabled",

matchIfMissing = true)

@Configuration(proxyBeanMethods = false)

@AutoConfigureBefore(FeignAutoConfiguration.class)

@EnableConfigurationProperties({ FeignHttpClientProperties.class })

@Import({ HttpClientFeignLoadBalancedConfiguration.class,

OkHttpFeignLoadBalancedConfiguration.class,

DefaultFeignLoadBalancedConfiguration.class })

publicclassFeignRibbonClientAutoConfiguration{

// ......

}

spring.cloud.loadbalancer.ribbon.enabled配置为true或者未配置时,@ConditionalOnProperty自动配置条件都会成立。但是,当不导入ribbonstarter时,ILoadBalancer是不存在的,@ConditionalOnClass不满足条件,只有导入ribbonstarter包时,才会导入HttpClientFeignLoadBalancedConfigurationOkHttpFeignLoadBalancedConfiguration

DefaultFeignLoadBalancedConfiguration这几个配置类。

  • HttpClientFeignLoadBalancedConfiguration生效的条件是我们项目中添加fegin-httpclient的依赖;

  • OkHttpFeignLoadBalancedConfiguration生效的条件是我们项目中添加了okhttp的依赖,且配置了feign.okhttp.enabledtrue

  • DefaultFeignLoadBalancedConfiguration生效的条件是前两者都不生效。

@Configuration(proxyBeanMethods = false)

classDefaultFeignLoadBalancedConfiguration{

@Bean

@ConditionalOnMissingBean

public Client feignClient(CachingSpringLoadBalancerFactory cachingFactory,

SpringClientFactory clientFactory){

returnnew LoadBalancerFeignClient(new Client.Default(null, null),cachingFactory,clientFactory);

}

}

所以,当不导入ribbonstarter时,ILoadBalancer不存在,FeignRibbonClientAutoConfiguration自动配置不会起作用,没有注入Client,但是因为没有配置url,所以走了loadBalanceloadBalance方法中拿不到Client,最终抛出异常。

那么怎么解决这个问题?

两种方法:

  • 1、 添加ribbonstarter依赖

    sck-demo项目种添加ribbonstarter

<dependency>

<groupId>org.springframework.cloud</groupId>

<artifactId>spring-cloud-starter-kubernetes-ribbon</artifactId>

</dependency>

  • 2、不想添加ribbonstarter依赖,因为用不到,那么就需要显示配置url

    你可以将url配置http://${spring.application.name}

END

笔者主要通过阅读源码解决自己的一些疑问,也希望通过本篇的分析能够帮助到大家。

以上是 Spring Cloud OpenFeign源码分析,你是否遇到过不导入Ribbon应用会启动不起来? 的全部内容, 来源链接: utcz.com/a/27577.html

回到顶部